Fortinet Security Fabric: Enabling Digital Innovation and Cope with Growing Threats

Fortinet Network Security

Security threats are a part of this infrastructure’s evolution. Organizations must deal with larger attack surfaces, sophisticated threats, more complicated infrastructure, and a changing regulatory environment. Organizations must embrace a cybersecurity platform that offers visibility throughout their environment and a way to manage security and network operations to achieve their intended DI objectives while managing risks and decreasing complexity. 

With comprehensive, automated solutions that enable security-driven networking, zero-trust network access, dynamic cloud security, and AI-driven security operations, the Fortinet Network Security Fabric addresses these issues. An ecosystem of seamlessly connected third-party products that augment Fortinet’s offerings reduces the gaps in enterprise security architectures while maximizing security return on investment (ROI).

Digital Innovation is transforming all Industries. 

Globally, DI is regarded as essential to business expansion and a better consumer experience. Most CIOs are optimistic about their DI ambitions, with 61% reporting that they already have sizable cloud, IoT, and mobile operations. 

IT and cybersecurity leaders at cloud service providers see DI as several different changes to their network environments. Users are becoming more mobile, and user endpoints and locations are outside the control of the corporate IT department to access the network. Additionally, they are using Office 365 and other essential business software by connecting directly to public clouds. IoT devices are more numerous than human-controlled endpoints and are widely dispersed, frequently in unsupervised and remote areas.

All these changes render the idea of a defendable network perimeter rendered outdated, necessitating cloud service providers to adopt a new multilayer defence-in-depth strategy. 

Migration of applications and workloads to the cloud 

Almost all companies have begun moving some workloads and applications to the cloud, or at the absolute least, they plan to. These choices are frequently motivated by a desire to cut costs while enhancing operational efficiency and scalability by utilizing the cloud’s flexibility.

Numerous deployment models are available from cloud service providers. Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) programmes and services, like Salesforce or Box, can be used by businesses. An alternative is to move applications created and deployed in on-premises environments to Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) or Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) deployments like those offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, and IBM Cloud. 

Many enterprises have embraced a multi-cloud infrastructure out of caution against cloud service provider lock-in and to deploy each application and workload in the cloud for which it is most suited. The drawback of such flexibility is they have to become familiar with each cloud environment’s peculiarities.

Additionally, they must utilize several tools to administer the environment and its security features, which obscures visibility and calls for using numerous management consoles for managing policies, reporting, and other tasks. 

Several endpoints spread across different settings 

The endpoint may be the weakest node in the cloud service provider’s network. Thousands of employees at the more significant providers access network resources using personal and work devices. Ensuring cyber hygiene and current endpoint security is a difficult chore on all of these devices. The spread of IoT gadgets is much more frightening. By the end of 2019, there were more than 26.66 billion active devices, and by the end of 2020, experts predict that there will be 31 billion active devices worldwide.

There are several commercial situations where IoT devices are present. They give clients in the retail and hotel industries individualized experiences, maintain inventory in manufacturing and logistics, and keep an eye on equipment on factory floors or power plants. 

IoT devices frequently prioritize performance above security features and secure communication protocols. They are often ruggedized and power-efficient. And unlike most network-attached devices, IoT equipment is usually installed in unmanned or infrequently staffed buildings, outdoors, or remote areas (such as power stations). The device routinely transmits sensitive data to on-site data centres and cloud services from these vulnerable places.

Increased commercial presence in several areas and regions 

As they expand globally, companies face increasing wide-area network (WAN) bandwidth limits. SaaS applications, video, and VoIP boost productivity and enable new services, but they exponentially increase WAN traffic.

Multiprotocol label switching (MPLS), a very dependable WAN communication technology, has long been the standard. However, MPLS makes it challenging to adjust quality-of-service levels as required for various applications and optimize WAN bandwidth utilization. As a result, WAN expenses might suddenly skyrocket due to branch expansion and service improvements.

Four Things to Think About When Designing Security Architecture 

The consequences for network security are sometimes disregarded or understated when enterprises excitedly move forward with DI projects. More than 80% of businesses are implementing new digital advances before they can protect themselves from cyber dangers. 9 

When creating secure infrastructures for their digitally innovative companies, IT leaders must overcome four significant obstacles: 

Increasing the assault surface 

Sensitive data may be located anywhere and may transit via several links outside the company’s control. Every new cloud instance expands the company’s attack surface since applications in the cloud are accessible over the internet.

IoT gadgets increase the attack surface to unmanned, outlying areas. Intrusions can fester undiscovered for weeks or months in these hidden areas of the attack surface, wreaking havoc on the rest of the company. The attack surface becomes unpredictable when users move between corporate premises, across public spaces, and across international boundaries, thanks to mobile devices and user-owned endpoints. In actuality, factors that increase the cost of a data breach by hundreds of thousands of dollars per record include:

  • Substantial cloud migration.
  • Extensive use of mobile platforms.
  • Extensive use of IoT devices. 

This increased, dynamic attack surface destroys the once well-defined network perimeter and the related security safeguards.

Attackers find it far simpler to enter the network, and once inside, they frequently encounter few barriers to travelling freely and undetected to their objectives. Because it is assumed that the perimeter will eventually be penetrated, security in DI organisations must be multilayered and include controls on every network component. Additionally, the least privilege and continually verified trust principles must govern access to network resources. 

Advanced threat environment 

The universe of cyber threats is expanding quickly as malicious actors try to get around and beyond conventional cybersecurity protections. On any one day, up to 40% of newly discovered malware is zero days or previously undiscovered. The proliferation of zero-day malware reduces the effectiveness of conventional, signature-based malware detection techniques, whether caused by a rise in the use of polymorphic malware or the accessibility of malware toolkits. Additionally, criminals still use social engineering by using static thrust techniques in conventional security solutions. According to studies, social engineering or phishing attempts occurred in 85% of businesses last year.

Data mishaps and breaches are harder to find and fix as cyber attackers get more sophisticated. Beyond the ability to detect and prevent an attempted assault, businesses must also be able to identify and remediate a successful attack quickly. Between 2018 and 2019, the time to discover and control a data breach increased from 266 to 279 days.17 All firms are vulnerable to attack, proving the importance of cyber resiliency. Over 88% of organisations reported suffering at least one incident in the previous year. 

More complicated ecosystems 

According to over half of CIOs, a growing attack surface presents the most major problem because of its increased complexity. The fact that many organisations rely on various nonintegrated point solutions for security is the cause of this growing complexity. In actuality, the typical business employs over 75 different security systems. 20 

These firms need more security integration to benefit from automation in their security implementation. The prevalence of manual processes is citing as the top security concern in their firm by 30% of CIOs. 21 Without security automation, CIOs would need to hire more highly qualified cybersecurity specialists to oversee and protect their networks. 

However, many businesses need help finding the cybersecurity talent they need. According to estimates, there are currently more than 4 million open cybersecurity roles, and the number is continuously rising.

Looking for cybersecurity solutions? You may schedule a call with specialist Spectrum Edge which might help you on this.

Article posted by

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *